Tuesday, May 13, 2008

outside.in · PS 15 - Patrick F. Daly School · Brooklyn, NY

0 comments

outside.in · PS 15 - Patrick F. Daly School · Brooklyn, NY

PS 15 - Patrick F. Daly School
71 Sullivan St
Brooklyn, NY
Got something to say about PS 15 - Patrick F. Daly School? Say it in discussions.
Latest thread in Brooklyn Discussions Ice Cream Parlor in Brooklyn?
See all 197 threads about Brooklyn · or start a new one!
Red Hook Parents Upset: DOE to Put New Charter School In PS 15 onlytheblogknowsbrooklyn.typepad.com - March 31, 2008
The mother of a student at PS 15 in Red Hook wrote to say that the Department of Education has decided to place a new charter school in their building starting next fall. Many of the parents connec... »
what: · · ·
Upcoming: The Return of "Off the Hook" gowanuslounge.blogspot.com - March 28, 2008
"Off the Hook: Original Plays by Red Hook Kids" returns April 18-19 in Red Hook for its ninth production since the series began in 2004. So far, 30 local young people have written and performed 39 ... »
what: · · · ·
No Holds Barred: When Brooklyn Kids Take the Stage onlytheblogknowsbrooklyn.typepad.com - March 27, 2008
I just got this invite in my inbox about "Off the Hook: Original Plays by Red Hook Kids" returns April 18-19 in Red Hook All of the enthusiasm, inventiveness, and fearlessness that Brooklyn kids ar... »
what: · · ·
Something to say about PS 15 - Patrick F. Daly School? Join us and you can add articles and stories.
Parents win: Education Department agrees not to add charter school to Red Hook’s PS 15 http://www.brooklynpaper.com/stories/31/8/31_08_parents_win_education.html - February 21, 2008
Falling to an aggressive political assault by parents, teachers and even the widow of a beloved former principal, the Department of Education caved this week, agreeing not to sandwich a charter sch... »
what: · · ·
Rules of the Playground errorink.wordpress.com - January 23, 2008
Read my most recent story on a renovated playground at Red Hook, Brooklyn’s elementary school, Patrick F. Daly Public School 15. »
what: · · ·

videos

0 comments

I have a 45 minute montage of video clips available that's arranged sequentially, and had titles inserted between sections identifying some of the key participants and speakers. Because it's a large file, it's been impossible for me to upload to the blog so far - but it DOES fit on a CD perfectly, If anyone's interested in a copy, call me and we'll make arrangements for you to get a copy on CD.
Emily Brown * 917-325-1348

Monday, May 12, 2008

Videos

0 comments

I'll be uploading more video clips from the public hearing over the next few days... keep checking back. It's much faster for me to do this at the library...

More video clips from DOE Public Hearing

0 comments

more video clips from the DOE Public Hearing

0 comments

0 comments

Video Clip from DOE Public Hearing re: siting PAVE Academy at PS15

1 comments

Sunday, May 11, 2008

0 comments

So far, the majority of the posts I've added to this blog have been material I've found on the internet about the controversy over the relative merits of public schools and charter schools, and the background on the PAVE Academy. I haven't written much original material about this yet because the blog started out as a research project; I wanted to learn as much as I could about the controversy and share it with the Red Hook community so we could all form conclusions together.

In selecting the material I've posted, I admit that I have a bias - and it's very much against the movement to promote charter schools in general, but more specifically, it's about not wanting to give up on the idea of an equal-access, truly public and democratic education system for any and every student. Our public school system is far from perfect, and I know that; some charter schools appear to be doing a good job of helping students succeed and excel. What I oppose is the concept of eliminating one type of school system in favor of another; I'm opposed to privatization and moving away from accountability to the public, which is what the charter school system seems to be promoting. So far, I've heard a lot of arguments from the charter school side that their schools are public schools. If they were truly public schools, why do they accept students on a lottery basis instead of open enrollment? This seems to be one of several major inconsistencies.

Another argument put forward by the charter school movement is that they receive less funding than public schools do - I've heard one figure quoted most often, that they receive 70% of the funding that public schools do. I counter this argument with these facts: there are several foundations set up to fund charter schools that are specifically tailored to fund only charter schools, and exclude public schools from applying for and receiving funds. It also appears that here in New York City, despite the enormous budget cuts our schools are facing, charter schools receive a portion of the money still allocated to schools specifically to recruit new students. I have yet to find any mention of funds allocated to public schools to do the same thing, in spite of the pattern of co-siting charter schools within public schools that have low enrollment.

I'll be writing more of my own material - and posting it - from now on.

It's good to see that other organizations are using this blog as a resource despite Spencer Robertson's comment in an email a little while ago that not many people are actually reading it. The web counter shows that at least 150, sometimes closer to 300 people are at least looking at it on a daily basis. It's even begun to show up in the Google Blog alerts for PS15 that I get on a daily basis. I hope others find it useful; the problem PS15 is having is one that many other schools share, and I'd like to hope that one day we can band together and reform the DOE's destructive practices.



--
"Never underestimate the power of a small, dedicated group of people to change the world; indeed, that is the only thing that ever has." - Margaret Mead

Read my blog, Charter Free PS15 at http://charter-free-ps15.blogspot.com/

Conspiracy Planet - Julian Robertson Lawsuit Archives - King & Spalding: Legal Weasel Richard Marooney

0 comments

Conspiracy Planet - Julian Robertson Lawsuit Archives - King & Spalding: Legal Weasel Richard Marooney: "King & Spalding: Legal Weasel Richard Marooney
by URI DOWBENKO


(PHOTO: The possibly senile former alleged billionaire Julian Robertson who has sued Conspiracy Planet and Al Martin Raw.com)

There are many questions to be answered. First of all, why would Julian Robertson sue Conspiracy Planet and Al Martin Raw.com -- opening himself up to discovery regarding the failure of his hedge fund Tiger Management? Did legal weasel Richard Marooney of King & Spalding law firm talk him into it -- or is he so hot-headed that he didn't foresee the inevitable consequences -- that he would be forced to divulge the facts about the demise of his company, confessing as he did, that 'We are in a market I don't understand,' according to the Sunday Times of London (April 2, 2000?

Is Marooney sleeping with Judge Loretta Preska to get favorable rulings from her? Or is he just having drinks with her? How else to explain Judge Preska's judicial misconduct regarding the case?

Here are the facts regarding collusion, if not conspiracy, with plaintiff's attorney.
More"

Conspiracy Planet - Julian Robertson Lawsuit Archives - Motion: Mental Exam for Julian Robertson

0 comments

I wonder if this is why Spencer Robertson thought it was ok to call PS15's principal to request that she tell me to stop posting material to my blog before the public hearing. Let them try suing me. I've got absolutely nothing, and they'd be wasting their time.

Conspiracy Planet - Julian Robertson Lawsuit Archives - Motion: Mental Exam for Julian Robertson:

"Motion: Mental Exam for Julian Robertson
by CONSPIRACY PLANET
'You'd
have to be crazy to sue me, especially if you're a failed hedge fund manager
like Julian Robertson,' says Conspiracy Planet publisher Uri Dowbenko. 'That's
why we filed a motion in his frivolous lawsuit for a court ordered psychological
examination for him.'

The Motion for a Court Ordered Mental Competence
Evaluation of Plaintiff Julian Robertson is the latest salvo in the battle for
the First Amendment. After all, the 73-year old Robertson may or may not
understand the lawsuit that his attorney Richard Marooney of King & Spalding
law firm has filed against Conspiracy Planet, Al Martin Raw, Uri Dowbenko and Al
Martin

The 'legal' harassment of writers and
publishers is the latest trend to stifle free speech in America, as the First
Amendment remains under attack while writers and publishers continue being sued.

Donald Trump sued author Timothy L. O'Brien and Time Warner for
his book 'TrumpNation: The Art of Being the Donald,' in which O'Brien wrote that
Trump was worth $250 million, not the $2."

Conspiracy Planet - Julian Robertson Lawsuit Archives - Julian Robertson v. Conspiracy Planet: Answer

0 comments

Conspiracy Planet - Julian Robertson Lawsuit Archives - Julian Robertson v. Conspiracy Planet: Answer: "Julian Robertson v. Conspiracy Planet: Answer
by URI DOWBENKO
The 73-year old Julian Robertson still hasn't learned. Is it old age, senility, arrogance, ego or a combination of them all?

In 1996 Julian Robertson filed a frivolous lawsuit against Business Week Magazine for $1 billion because it was 'a nice round number' he said. He settled out of court with no moey changing hands.

More recently, failed hedge fund manager Julian H. Robertson Jr., who escaped to New Zealand after losing all but $6 billion of $23 billion under management in his Tiger hedge fund, sued Conspiracy Planet in yet another meritless and frivolous lawsuit.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
________________________________________________________________

JULIAN H. ROBERTSON, Jr. ) No. 05-CV-7046 Judge Preska

Plaintiff, ) ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
v."

Conspiracy Planet - Julian Robertson Lawsuit Archives - Court Orders Discovery for Julian Robertson

0 comments

Conspiracy Planet - Julian Robertson Lawsuit Archives - Court Orders Discovery for Julian Robertson

Court Orders Discovery for Julian Robertson by URI DOWBENKO
Is failed hedge fund manager Julian "I Don't Really Understand the Markets" Robertson mentally competent to file yet another frivolous lawsuit? After all he sued Business Week magazine for $1 billion because it was "a nice round number," then settled out of court with no money changing hands.Discovery ordered by Federal Judge Loretta Preska may answer this question, as well as whether the 73-year old Robertson, who used to manage Tiger Management LLC and who filed suit against Al Martin Raw.com and Conspiracy Planet.com, really understands the import of this legal action, or whether it is an abuse of process and act of champerty by his attorney Richard Marooney of the King & Spalding law firm.Robertson's mental health is certainly at issue, especially in filing this suit against Uri "You'd Have To Be Crazy To Sue Me" Dowbenko, publisher of Conspiracy Planet and other alternative media websites"DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 3 All documents authenticating Julian Robertson’s most recent medical/ physical exam records, as well as mental health exam (mental component) certifying his ability to understand the lawsuit undertaken against defendants, as well as a list of all prescribed medications attributable to plaintiff during the last 3 years.

Conspiracy Planet - Julian Robertson Lawsuit Archives - Julian Robertson Refuses Mental Exam

0 comments

This is interesting...

Conspiracy Planet - Julian Robertson Lawsuit Archives - Julian Robertson Refuses Mental Exam: "Julian Robertson Refuses Mental Exam
by URI DOWBENKO
Julian Robertson, who managed his Tiger hedge fund from $23 billion down to $6 billion in 2000, has refused court ordered discovery for a mental exam regarding his frivolous lawsuit against Al Martin Raw.com, Conspiracy Planet.com et al.

His attorney Richard Marooney of King & Spalding has responded by stonewalling the request for 'All documents authenticating Julian Robertson's most recent medical/physical exam records, as well as mental health exam (mental component) certifying his ability to understand the lawsuit undertaken against defendants, as well as a list of all prescribed medications attributable to plaintiff during the last 3 years'.

Marooney writes 'In addition to the foregoing General Objections, Plaintiff objects to Request No. 3 on the grounds that it is overbroad, unduly burdensome, intentionally designed to harass Mr. Robertson, and calls for information that is not relevant to any claim or defense of any party.'

Defendants maintain that the mental status of 73-year old Julian 'We Are in a Market I Don't Understand' Robertson is not irrelevant.
More


Other Top Stories
Julian Robertson Refuses Mental Exam by URI DOWBENKO
Court Orders Discovery for Julian Robertson by URI DOWBENKO
Julian Robertson v. Conspiracy Planet: Answer by URI DOWBENKO
Motion: Mental Exam for Julian Robertson by CONSPIRACY PLANET
Conspiracy Planet:Julian Robertson Needs PsychExam by CONSPIRACY PLANET
King & Spalding: Legal Weasel Richard Marooney by URI DOWBENKO"

Tiger Foundation

0 comments

Tiger Foundation

This is the foundation run by Spencer Robertson's father, who is also a charter school supporter. Notice in the material below, taken directly from their website, the anti-NYC-public-school attitude - they practically blame the public school system for promoting the poverty cycle for urban children:

http://www.tigerfoundation.org/education.html

"One of the best means of breaking the cycle of poverty is to provide
children with a high quality education. Unfortunately, the New York City
public school system frequently fails the students who need that education
the most - those born into poor families, in communities lacking resources
and other educational options.
Thus, the Education program's overarching goal is to improve the city's public school system and to offer every child in New York City a high quality education.
Currently, the Foundation funds a variety of model schools and other systemic reform initiatives including charter schools and professional development for teachers and school leaders. We continue to examine how best to support individual charter schools and the broader charter school movement. We believe that charter schools are an excellent vehicle for public school reform.
Substantive change in a system this large and complex takes time, while daily kids struggle in inadequate public schools. Therefore as a secondary goal, the Education program supports academic enrichment programs designed to compensate for the deficiencies in schools, as well as some alternatives to the public school system. The Foundation funds a variety of academic enrichment models designed to offer intensive educational supports to students. All of these programs are offered by community-based organizations, not the public schools themselves. We do not support pure summer interventions or school-day curricular enhancements. All of the programs must document concrete outcomes showing improved academic performance."

Well, now we know where Spencer Robertson learned his agenda - right at home, from his father. Is this someone who's going to cooperate with PS15 if he's allowed to share space in our school? I wouldn't trust the arrangement to be beneficial to PS15 at all over the long term.

Gmail - NYC Public School Parents - More on school overcrowding and what should be done

0 comments

Gmail - NYC Public School Parents - More on school overcrowding and what should be done

Friday, May 9, 2008

EDUCATION WATCH INTERNATIONAL

0 comments

EDUCATION WATCH INTERNATIONAL
This article looks like it could be at least an important part of the solution to our problem; I'm surprised that Spencer Robertson, whose father is a philanthropist himself, doesn't appear to be aware of it. It's also nice to know that other people out there are noticing and reading my blog; in a recent email I received from Spencer Robertson, he said that he'd only recently read my blog and commented that he doubted that many other people were actually looking at it (despite the fact that there's a webcounter on it that as of today shows a count of over 1100 "hits"). Hmmm.

What I like about this particular material is that it doesn't just present the problem, but offers a potential solution for at least some charter schools, and presents specific examples.

Charter Schools To Receive Multimillion-Dollar Boost
Charter schools that have been struggling to find homes in New York will
receive a boost today from the Bush administration, in the form of a
multimillion-dollar grant. Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings is
presenting the award to a local group that finances, constructs, and renovates
charter school buildings, Civic Builders, Inc. The money will be used to aid
building efforts in New York City and Newark, N.J., charter schools, according
to sources familiar with the grant. Both the New York City schools chancellor,
Joel Klein, and the Newark mayor, Cory Booker, will be on hand at today's
announcement. The grant comes as charter schools in the city face what officials
at Civic Builders have termed a space "crisis." Charter schools are publicly
funded but privately managed, and state laws often do not guarantee them space
in public school buildings. In New York City, Mayor Bloomberg and his Department
of Education have worked to help secure space for charter schools, welcoming
them into public school buildings with some extra space, where the charter
schools usually get a hallway or floor and part-time access to the cafeteria and
gymnasium.They are becoming more and more common, but these sharing arrangements
are politically perilous, with parents and teachers at existing schools crying
foul and enlisting elected officials to back their protests. One school's
protest has migrated to the Internet, where a Red Hook mother started a Web log,
Charter-Free PS15. Another protest planned for this Wednesday is also expected
to draw attention to the issue.Civic Builders helps charter schools construct
and lease buildings that are separate from public facilities. With the help of
private philanthropy, it has transformed a Bronx parking garage into a
43,000-square-foot school and a kosher salami factory in Hunts Point into a
school with an arts specialty, and built a 90,000-square-foot school complete
with a 10,000-volume library, a climbing wall, and a rooftop athletic area in
the Bedford-Stuyvesant section of Brooklyn. The grant is part of a federal
program aimed at making it more attractive - and less risky - for
philanthropists to invest in charter school construction projects. The Bush
administration has already awarded more than $175 million in grants to similar
projects across the country, according to Education Department grant lists.Source

NYC Public School Parents: Charter schools: the billionaire's boys club?

0 comments

Click on this link - NOW!: NYC Public School Parents: Charter schools: the billionaire's boys club?

Thursday, May 8, 2008

Response to a Comment on a recent post

2 comments

A cyber-philosopher going by the moniker Socrates recently left a new comment on the post "May 7th Public Hearing":

So you would prefer that schools don't teach students to be good people? You
would prefer that they are soul-less institutions of purely academic
orientation? How sad.
Hmmm. With everything else that I brought up in that particular post, this is the one thing this clever person picked up on. He/she/it completely missed the point that what I - and several other community members had an issue with was the way the issue was raised (patronizingly, smugly, and out of context in a public hearing) leaving teachers, parents and others with a really bad taste in their mouths, and then dealt with afterwards. Tim Burke may have been trying to make a positive point about the PAVE Academy's curriculum, but he presented it so poorly that it came across as an insult to at least part of a roomful of people, and then, instead of apologizing, became confrontational.

I think "Socrates" is probably an armchair philosopher who wants to engage in an epistemological, ontological debate (there's a couple of $10 words fer ya, Socrates - see? I went to college too) about whether it's a good idea to teach values in school. Values get taught in school intentionally and unintentionally, directly and indirectly all the time - by teachers, guidance counselors, other kids, etc. It's part of the socialization process. It's also part of the disciplinary process when kids act up in school.

But I'm going to answer your question with some other questions.

  • How do you define a "good" person? Your definition might be different from mine, and it would be interesting to see where the overlaps are AND where the differences are.
  • "Socrates", if you have a child, who would you prefer to have teaching him or her about values and character in school? Would you prefer your child learn from people who treat him fairly, who encourage him to develop intellectual curiosity and fair play in dealing with people he interacts with, whether they're peers or authority figures? Would you prefer he learn about character from people who negotiate well and look for common ground and real consensus in their solutions to conflict, or from people who are routinely patronizing, rude, and whose primary interests appear to be to get what they want whatever the cost, by any means necessary?

As a parent, I can tell you right away that I have no issue whatsoever with having the PS15 staff help build the character of my son, because over the past 5 years, they've done a wonderful job with him - he's curious, he scores well on tests, he's learned a huge amount about working out differences with other students fairly, he's empathetic and sympathetic, and because he's treated well there, he also makes an effort to reciprocally do the right thing and treat others well. I'm looking at the big picture, which is that they've participated in helping develop a boy with good character. On the other hand, I've watched the DOE and the PAVE Academy people work in tandem to ensure that the PAVE Academy gets exactly what it wants - which is a rent-free location for their school, with no fiscal or other accountability to the public whose taxes support education - through underhanded tactics. They've demonstrated very poor character in my book because they've misrepresented information to the public (I'm being kind here: others would call this LYING); in other cases, they've restricted or hidden information. They've also proceeded with their plans independently of the very people most affected by the long range impact of these plans, and they seem to feel that if they repeat certain meaningless key phrases often enough, their opposition will give up and roll over. This is arrogant and patronizing, and not to be tolerated from anyone.

Read through the earlier posts to this blog and connect the dots yourself (including Spencer Robertson's emails to me, which I've posted here) if you need to see the many other reasons I don't think the PAVE Academy people are equipped to appropriately help children build good character, and shouldn't be preaching about it to anyone until they can demonstrate some good character traits themselves.

I certainly wouldn't want MY son learning about character from people or organizations whose values are corrupt. That's part of why I don't want the PAVE Academy anywhere near my son's public school. Let them do their business elsewhere.

Emily Brown

May 7th Public Hearing

1 comments

I'd like to thank everyone who spoke up on behalf of PS15 last night; a lot of factual information was presented, and some very passionate and wonderful testimonies offered as well. You were all wonderful!
 
I'll be writing a lot more about the meeting later on, but wanted to point out that NOT ALL of the adults who appeared wearing PAVE's t-shirt were actually affiliated with PAVE - some of them were affiliated with other charter schools completely (Paul van Linden Tol recognized them ffrom another recent CEC meeting). I think it's tacky on Mr. Robertson's part to try to "pad" his supporters by disguising them as being directly affiliated with his school.
 
I'm glad to notice as well that I wasn't the only one who took issue Timothy Burke's description of PAVE's curriculum as being one that focuses on building character, as hough Red Hook residents need help in that area. What made it worse was that he got defensive and almost argumentative about it afterwards. Seems like particularly bad public relations for PAVE... maybe he needs a muzzle next time Mr. Robertson takes him out in public.
It's sad that the DOE representatives can't find a way to make a commitment one way or the other about whether we'll be playing host to PAVE next year - their stock response seemed to be unanimously and repeatedly "we'll have to see, onlhy time will tell, we'll get back to you about that." Do keep in mind, though, that this comes from Michael Duffy, who told me several weeks ago when I called to find out about when the public hearing would be scheduled claimed not to know and claimed he needed to check with a colleague - and oddly enough, he's the one who signed the letter announcing last night's meeting.
 
It looks as though we have several politicians and John McGettrick in our corner, though, and I hope that their help does the trick.
 
I just got a call from a parent from a public school in Bushwick that is in the same dilemma. She'd be interested in working together to present a larrger unified front.
 
And thanks for looking in on my humble blog; as of yesterday, the site had  more than 1000 hits (and Spencer Robertson seems to think nobody's reading it at all).
 
Emily
--
"Never underestimate the power of a small, dedicated group of people to change the world; indeed, that is the only thing that ever has." - Margaret Mead

Read my blog, Charter Free PS15 at http://charter-free-ps15.blogspot.com/

Wednesday, May 7, 2008

New York City Center for Charter School Excellence | NYC Charter School

0 comments

This link discusses the 19 new charter schools approved for opening in the coming year - click on this link to see more: New York City Center for Charter School Excellence NYC Charter School: "PAVE".

Charter Schools, Special Programs, Choices & Enrollment, New York City Department of Education

0 comments

Here is the Department of Education's official definition of charter schools: click on this link Charter Schools, Special Programs, Choices & Enrollment, New York City Department of Education

2007-08 Class Size Report (updated on 2/15/08), Class Size Report, DOE Data, About Us, New York City Department of Education

0 comments

Click on this link 2007-08 Class Size Report (updated on 2/15/08), Class Size Report, DOE Data, About Us, New York City Department of Education for more information about the DOE's reports on class sizes.

Enroll Your Child | PAVE Academy Charter School

0 comments



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: moderator <emilyholiday@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, May 7, 2008 at 9:19 AM
Subject: Enroll Your Child | PAVE Academy Charter School
To: emilyholiday@gmail.com


[http://www.paveacademy.org/enroll-your-child]
This explains the enrollment process at the PAVE Academy: Enroll Your Child PAVE Academy Charter School.

One thing I don't understand is this: in the original proposal for the PAVE Academy, it stated that the goal was to have a balance of 50% Latino / 50% African American students enrolled at PAVE. How is it possible to do that and also have a random, impartial lottery?

--
Posted By moderator to noskeeters at 5/07/2008 09:19:00 AM



--
"Never underestimate the power of a small, dedicated group of people to change the world; indeed, that is the only thing that ever has." - Margaret Mead

Read my blog, Charter Free PS15 at http://charter-free-ps15.blogspot.com/

Dean of Students and Families

0 comments

This is the only position I've seen posted so far where certification was required - but only two years of teaching experience are required, and the candidate could potentially get the position with only a B.A. By the way, the Dean would also be expected to fill in for absent teachers... what happened to using substitute teachers?

Tuesday, May 6, 2008

Parent Involvement and Power

0 comments

Click on the link in the box above to read a sobering article about how the education system has been restructured in ways that make it even more difficult for parents to be truly involved and have an impact. Something needs to be done.

the public advocacy project

0 comments

the public advocacy project - Parental Power and Mayoral Control: Avenues for Parent and Community Involvement in New York City Schools Clara Hemphill
Clara Hemphill is an acclaimed author, editor and social entrepreneur. The New York Times called her three books “the most definitive guides” to New York City public schools. New York magazine named her one of the 200 most influential New Yorkers for her work “empowering parents” as founding editor of the Insideschools.org website. As a reporter and editorial writer for New York Newsday, she shared the 1991 Pulitzer Prize for local reporting. New York magazine called her writing on the homeless “worthy of Dickens.” A foreign correspondent for The Associated Press and a producer for CBS News based in Rome in the 1980s, she covered the war in Lebanon, the attempted assassination of the pope and numerous Mafia murders. She lives in Manhattan with her husband, Robert Snyder, and two children, who attend public school.

the public advocacy project

0 comments

This section of the public advocate's website focuses on the Commission on School Governance: click the link the public advocacy project

Bloomberg Proposes Lean Budget - New York Times

0 comments

Look carefully through this article to see how much money is being spent on charter schools, despite budget cuts to education in NYC - click on this link: Bloomberg Proposes Lean Budget - New York Times

NY1: Education: Charter Schools cannot be audited

0 comments

According to this article, Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli has been barred from auditing the city's charter schools because of a judge's ruling that the DOE (rather than the state) oversees charter schools. Click on this link: NY1: Education

DOE Public Meeting: siting of charter school PAVE Academy at PS15 in Red Hook - Black New Yorkers for Educational Excellence | Google Groups

0 comments

Here's something picked up by a Google Group, one that looks excellent - click on the following link: DOE Public Meeting: siting of charter school PAVE Academy at PS15 in Red Hook - Black New Yorkers for Educational Excellence Google Groups

Background on the Gag Order - and Why I Cannot Comply

0 comments

On Saturday, May 2, I got a phone call from Mrs. LaBoy, the parent coordinator at PS15; she explained that Ms. Wyns-Madison (the principal) had gotten phone calls from Spencer Robertson and the Department of Education requesting that I stop posting material to my blog, at least until after the meeting on Wednesday May 7. Initially I agreed to stop posting for a few days until after the meeting.

I've given this careful consideration for the past few days, and I can't in good faith NOT continue to keep the blog going. I'm sincerely sorry if this puts Ms. Wyns-Madison in an awkward position.

I'll be blunt: I'm annoyed with the DOE and with Mr. Robertson; approaching the principal about this, when it should be abundantly clear that she is not affiliated with this blog, is an underhanded maneuver. It's also a spineless, cowardly tactic to use. The only reason I've gone along with it up to this point is because I respect Ms. Wyns-Madison as a true professional, and didn't want to make a difficult situation worse for her. She's been placed in the middle of a situation by a bureaucracy whose sense of entitlement is grossly inflated, and it's also interesting to note that the DOE apparently listens more to the charter school camp than they do the public schools. I hope that this isn't an indication of what sharing space and negotiating with Mr. Robertson (and the DOE) will be like in the future should the PAVE Academy be co-sited in PS15.

I don't know about you, but in my case, blood's thicker than water; one of the most important reasons I started the blog in the first place is because my son attends PS15, and I'm trying to protect his interests - along with the interests of his classmates and their families. I'm taking this issue very personally because it's an attack on my child's school.

I find it somewhat ironic that I'm being told to suppress a public forum after spending more than a decade promoting freedom of expression in Brooklyn through hosting a series of literary readings that on occasion presented somewhat controversial political material. I also initiated and coordinated the Brooklyn Alternative Small Press Fair, which for five successive years promoted independent publishing in Brooklyn - and which incorporated many participants who presented political material that larger presses wouldn't deal with (see www.geocities.com/emilybrooklyn/smallpressfair for more information on that).

What really rubs me the wrong way about this is an issue of standards and integrity: when I was applying for grants to cover expenses for the Small Press Fairs, I had to be completely accountable in my grant proposals for certain key issues including the location of the event (I had to provide a letter of agreement with the directors of the venues I used stating that the event would be held on their premises on specific dates) and all financial information (receipts had to be provided for every expenditure), and I had to explain in detail exactly how my event would serve the community - and I got funded each year I requested grant monies because I presented totally feasible proposals and budgets, and I stuck to them. I was also responsible for providing detailed interim and final reports regarding the events to my funders. Why aren't Charter Schools held to the same level of accountability and integrity? Without knocking the relevance of the humanities programs I've been responsible for, it seems to me that educating children is a higher priority - there's far more at stake - so why aren't the agencies responsible for educating and helping shape our children held to the same or a higher standard?

I'll be posting more shortly - but I just wanted to let everyone know why the blog was so quiet for several days. Meanwhile, as of Monday, the number of viewers was well over 900, and I'm hoping that by Wednesday, we'll have passed the 1000 mark.

Emily

Monday, May 5, 2008

Blog Under Attack - Gag Order In Effect

1 comments



I've been officially asked to stop posting to this blog until after Wednesday's meeting. Much as it annoys me to be subject to censorship, I'm taking it under consideration - for now. Apparently I've hit a nerve with both the DOE and Spencer Robertson.

As of Wednesday night, though, look for new posts. Blogger is terrific: it now allows users to schedule when a post will appear at a future date and time - and I've scheduled a series of posts to appear starting at 6:00 on May 7.

Sunday, May 4, 2008

Official DOE Fact Sheet about PS15/PAVE Academy Co-Siting

0 comments

If you click directly on the picure, you'll be able to see a bigger version... I'll try to re-post this in a better format later, but I just wanted to get this up. It's the document that John White from the DOE specifically requested I post.

Gmail - NYC Public School Parents - 2 new articles - emilyholiday@gmail.com

0 comments

Click this link: https://mail.google.com/mail/?source=navclient#inbox/119b318e8b5ff61d

Saturday, May 3, 2008

NYC Public School Parents

0 comments

NYC Public School Parents Click on the link for this terrific blog that ISN'T connected to the DOE.

Friday, May 2, 2008

John White wants me to post something on the blog on behalf of the DOE

1 comments

I just checked my email and got this message from John White. Of course, the file he wants me to post requires software I don't have installed on the computer I'm using, so I can't open it. Hmmm. I wish I knew what it says.

He emailed me back later on Friday and told me he'd send the document to me in another format on Monday.
Emily

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: White John <JWhite8@schools.nyc.gov>
Date: Fri, May 2, 2008 at 4:58 PM
Subject: posting
To: emilyholiday@gmail.com


Per your online request for additional information regarding the siting of PAVE Academy, please see the attached fact sheet. I am requesting that you post it on the blog you operate.
John C. White
New York City Department of Education
(212) 374-5580




--
"Never underestimate the power of a small, dedicated group of people to change the world; indeed, that is the only thing that ever has." - Margaret Mead

Read my blog, Charter Free PS15 at http://charter-free-ps15.blogspot.com/

CEC15 D15 THIS IS A FRIENDLY REMINDER

0 comments

CEC15 D15 THIS IS A FRIENDLY REMINDER


District 15 Community Education Council
Invites you to
A Special Working Session for our Friends and Colleagues
Tuesday, May 6th6:30 P.M. - 8:30 P.M.
Dear Friends & Colleagues,
CEC15 has amended our Tuesday, May 6th working session to allow for a conversation with you.
Several of you have requested a time to meet with the CEC to inquire about how we may work together, or just to have more information about CEC. This is the opportunity.
You may be aware that CEC15 has had several changes since re-convening in September. Many of you have, in various ways, had to deal with a plethora of issues this school year - issues such as the School Budget Cuts, School siting, Changes in the gifted and talented programs, Middle school applications, the 8th grade promotion policy, and more which has kept us busy.
As volunteers with jobs, careers and family obligations, we struggle with the same time constraints as you. However we are eager to connect with you. Please prepare any questions you may have and be ready to share your organization's information with us.
Please RSVP to our Administrative Assistant, Romaine Smith at RSmith45@schools.nyc.gov or call our office at (718) 935 - 4267.

We look forward to seeing you on the Tuesday, May 6th @ 6:30pm - 8:30pm at 131 Livingston Street, room 610, 6th floor. Refreshments will be served.
Best Regards,CEC15

Thursday, May 1, 2008

Gmail - Would you like to get coffee tomorrow/after the hearing? - emilyholiday@gmail.com

0 comments

Here's an email I got from Spencer Robertson today:

Spencer Robertson to me 10:32 AM
Hi Emily- I am going to be out in Red Hook for a good portion of the
morning tomorrow. Would you like to get some coffee? Until this morning I hadn't
spent much time on your blog (apparently I'm not alone), but reading it, you
seem to have formed, what I think is safe to say, a fairly low opinion of me. I
initially thought your objection to PAVE was surrounding the prospect of it's
co-location, but reading deeper it seems as though it has somehow gotten
personal. I think that's unfortunate given the very limited interactions we have
had. When and if we meet, I'd be more than happy to explain the difference
between a for-profit entity and a not for profit 501(c)(3) and answer any other
questions you might have. I'd enjoy the opportunity to sit with you and
listen to your concerns. Hopefully I can address them, but at the very least you
will have a better understanding of me and what we (PAVE) are trying to
accomplish, and vice versa. I look forward to meeting at some
point- All the best- Spencer

I'm not entirely happy with the tone of the communication (and by the way, I've worked for quite a few not-for-profit organizations in the past 25 years, and I'm a member of one now as well - so I'm completely familiar with the differences between for-profit and not-for-profit entities) - BUT, at least he's willing to open a dialogue about concerns over the school situation.

Tuesday, April 29, 2008

URGENT! DOE Meeting on May 7 at 5:30 re: siting of PAVE Academy at PS15

0 comments

While checking my email this morning, I found this message from another parent whose child attends PS15:

When I was dropping off my daughter at PS 15, Ms. LaBoy (the parent
coordinator) informed me that DOE is holding a public meeting on the
siting of PAVE Academy at PS 15 next Wednesday, May 7 at 5:30 PM.
While DOE claims that this meeting is akin to the legally mandated public
hearing, it's unclear whether PS 15 parents and staff will be allowed to
testified. Moreover, the families awarded seats at PAVE via of
the lottery have already received notice that the school will be located PS
15 - weeks before the so-called public hearing. Sadly, the PAVE
families are being coached to raise a ruckus at the May 7 meeting to show
support for the charter school - clearly a sick and divisive tactic on
Spencer Robertson's part.

I'm glad she passed this information on - but it's warped that I made direct contact with the DOE offices in charge of charter schools on numerous occasions, and they claimed ignorance of when this meeting would be scheduled or even WHO was responsible for scheduling this.

Are we being intentionally deceived because the DOE has already made a decision about the siting of the charter school? I think it's very likely. I think it's also warped that Mr. Robertson also feels a need to resort to tactics like this to ensure that he has a location for his charter school; how does this serve the Red Hook community in any positive way? Is this someone we want to be stuck trying to negotiate with over two or more years? Does anyone else reading this blog think that this may be more about Mr. Roberston protecting his business interests rather than genuinely trying to help Red Hook's children? He makes a lot of noise about the importance of choice in education... I think we need to show him that true choice is a two way street.

I'll be contacting the school this morning to get more information about this, as well as the DOE.

If you support PS15, please make a point of attending this meeting and speak out. Email me at emilyholiday@gmail.com or phone me at 917-325-1348 if you want to discuss more details.

Emily

Monday, April 28, 2008

Meeting re: Charter Schools Tonight

0 comments

District 15 Community Education Council

“Empowering Parents to Claim Excellent Education for All Students”

131 Livingston Street, room 301B, Brooklyn, NY 11201

Phone: 718 935-4267 Fax: 718 935-4356

CEC15@schools.nyc.gov

www.cec15.org









SPECIAL CHARTER SCHOOL HEARING




Date: April 28, 2008
Time: 6:30pm – 8:00pm

Location: P.S. 146




AGENDA




1) Call to order




2) Introduction of members of the council – Ms. Jennifer Stringfellow




3) President’s Comments – Ms. Jennifer Stringfellow

4) Superintendent Rosemary Stuart - Introduction of Daniel Kikuji Rubenstein, Founder/Executive Director - Brooklyn Prospect Charter School www.brooklynprospect.org

5) Questions & Answers




6) Adjournment







Thank you for your active participation in your child(ren)’s education!







Next Calendar Meeting: Thursday, May 22nd, 2008 7:00pm - 9:00pm



Community District Education Council aka CEC, is a legislated body [See - Education Law, Title II. School District Organization, Article 52-A. New York City Community School District System NY CLS Educ.- 2590-c].

The Councils replaced the community school boards when the Mayor gained control of the school system, and are charged with representing parents’ perspective/issues/voices.

Fwd: Special Charter School Hearing Agenda

0 comments



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: CEC15 D15 <CEC15@schools.nyc.gov>
Date: Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 3:14 PM
Subject: Special Charter School Hearing Agenda
To:




District 15 Community Education Council

"Empowering Parents to Claim Excellent Education for All Students"

131 Livingston Street, room 301B, Brooklyn, NY 11201

Phone: 718 935-4267     Fax: 718 935-4356

CEC15@schools.nyc.gov <mailto:CEC15@schools.nyc.gov>

www.cec15.org



SPECIAL CHARTER SCHOOL HEARING




Date:  April 28, 2008


                                                Time:  6:30pm - 8:00pm

             Location:  P.S. 146



AGENDA



1)   Call to order



2)   Introduction of members of the council - Ms. Jennifer Stringfellow



3)   President's Comments - Ms. Jennifer Stringfellow

4)  Superintendent Rosemary Stuart - Introduction of Daniel Kikuji Rubenstein,     Founder/Executive Director - Brooklyn Prospect Charter School    www.brooklynprospect.org <http://www.brooklynprospect.org/>

5)   Questions & Answers



6)   Adjournment





Thank you for your active participation in your child(ren)'s education!





Next Calendar Meeting:      Thursday, May 22nd, 2008 7:00pm - 9:00pm



Community District Education Council aka CEC, is a legislated body [See - Education Law, Title II. School District Organization, Article 52-A. New York City Community School District System  NY CLS Educ.- 2590-c].

The Councils replaced the community school boards when the Mayor gained control of the school system, and are charged with representing parents' perspective/issues/voices.






--
"Never underestimate the power of a small, dedicated group of people to change the world; indeed, that is the only thing that ever has." - Margaret Mead

Read my blog, Charter Free PS15 at http://charter-free-ps15.blogspot.com/

Friday, April 18, 2008

DonorsChoose.org Blog: Sale on NYC Charter School Projects

3 comments

DonorsChoose.org Blog: Sale on NYC Charter School Projects Click on the link to find out more about one of the many generous ways organizations hand out money to Charter Schools.

It would be interesting to research whether similar funding is available for public schools.

Especially since I'm really irritated by certain people (ahem) complaining about how expensive it is to run a charter school (if you're going to complain about a key aspect of your job, then maybe you need to look for another occupation).

parent choice re: schools

1 comments

It's interesting to hear that you feel that your lottery was an opportunity to celebrate parent choice. However, I do feel that I need to respond to your email addressing the issue of choice, and our apparently differing definitions of the word.
 
While I personally don't think much of charter schools, I do not dispute the right of other parents to choose to send their children to charter schools. But the real, core issue in a discussion of choice as it applies to sharing PS15's building with a charter school is this: PS15 was not offered a choice in the matter. The staff and parents were not consulted ahead of time; there was absolutely no choice - let alone an informed choice - involved. We were delivered an ultimatum by the Department of Education in February. The decision to place your charter school (or any charter school for that matter) within PS15's building has been put on hold, temporarily, but in the  meantime, the DOE has failed to respond in a definite way to requests for more information on holding  a public hearing about the issue, or about the status of their decision. This is fairly typical of how the DOE operates, and I speak from personal experience.
 
However, what I'd like to ask you is this: what other locations, other than the PAL location, have you considered as a potential location for your charter school? Red Hook is gentrifying rapidly right now; it's considerably different from what it was 10 years ago, when my husband lived right around the corner from PS15.  There's considerable new construction going on in Red Hook. Surely there are other options available within the area that would not infringe on a public school that's doing extremely well because it has small class sizes combined with a dedicated staff, as well as strong support from its parents and the community. It serves as an anchor for the community because it also houses the Beacon program that runs an after school program, a summer camp, and additional recreation and social improvement opportunities for community residents - all of which would be compromised by having a competing school which also happens to be a privately run organization sharing its space and competing for the same resources it needs. Considering the recent budget cuts to public schools, this competition would be even more unfair. It seems to me that if you are really seriously dedicated to helping the children of Red Hook, especially through offering their families real choices, you could find a way to do this without compromising the community's award winning public school.
 
I'd also like to know how much influence you have over the DOE's decision on your ultimate location? Considering the resources that appear to be available to you, I think it's safe to assume that you are in a position to bargain with the DOE fairly easily, and that if you were able to find another location for your school on your own, there would be a much stronger possibility that PS15 and the PAVE Academy could co-exist within the same community on equal and fair footing, which would obviously present a more democratic choice to the community.
 
That's my two cents on the issue, but I think you should take a look at the blog and see that other members of the community are also not interested in having a charter school imposed on PS15. For every person that has publicly posted a comment on the issue, be assured that there are at least 100 others who feel the same way. I'm genuinely interested in finding out whether you've pursued other venues, and would appreciate finding out more about this. 
 
Thank you,
 
Emily Brown
 
--
"Never underestimate the power of a small, dedicated group of people to change the world; indeed, that is the only thing that ever has." - Margaret Mead

Read my blog, Charter Free PS15 at http://charter-free-ps15.blogspot.com/

A Response and Update from Spencer Robertson

0 comments

srobertson@paveacademy.orgHi Emily- I saw your warm and supportive note on our Idealist Page and thought it merited a response. We have indeed been actively pursuing space within the PAL on Clinton Street. John McGettrich has been extremely helpful in terms of helping attempt to connect us with the right people to make a location there feasible. Unfortunately, at this juncture at least, it doesn't look like that is going to work out. We held our lottery last week. More than 60 families attended (of the 115 who sought admission for their children). It was a beautiful evening- a celebration of parent choice. I have attached several photos that I believe capture the joy and excitement of the evening. In the future, if you would like to communicate with me- please email me directly (at this address) or call me at 212 437 8332. It's far easier for me to address your queries and concerns this way. Enjoy the splendid spring weather. Toodles-- Spencer

Spencer was responding to the following comment I posted in the forum section of his Idealist listing - interestingly enough, the PAVE Academy is no longer registered with Idealist as of the end of April:

I'm sure that you're aware at this point that the Red Hook community is strongly opposed to having the PAVE Academy located within PS15 for a variety of reasons - some of which include a lack of consistent transparent communication with the Red Hook community about alternative locations, and a strong concern that co-locating would have a profoundly negative impact on PS15 by affecting the number of students using the classrooms and other facitilies in the building.
Another source of concern is the impact on financial resources for PS15 during a time when budgets are being cut dramatically, should your school be occupying their premises (rent free, I'd like to add). What benefit does PS15 get from having a charter school foisted on them?
Have you been able to locate another site yet? Are you actively looking?
Obviously, you're entitled to start up a Charter School and run it as best you can, but does it really need to be at the expense of a public school that happens to be doing an excellent job of serving the population you claim to want to help so badly - without the financial backing of a rich family or other outside sources of funding, by the way. PS15 has succeeded where others might have failed because of a very dedicated staff and seasoned, committed teachers who have spent time establishing a close rapport with the community - some of them are members of the community themselves - and they've done it on a shoestring budget.I t's a bit ironic having an outside organization show up out of the blue trying to preach to the community about what's best for them.
Just out of curiousity, how many students have you managed to sign up through your lottery so far?
Anyone who wants to know more about opposition to placing the PAVE Academy in PS15 can take a look at http://charter-free-ps15.blogspot.com, which is chock-full of information and has had well over 300 hits in the month the blog's been up.
Emily Brown

The Brooklyn Paper: Family Calendar

0 comments

Note that on Saturday, April 19 at 3, PS15 will be the venue for plays written by Red Hook youth. Would we be able to do this next year if space had to be shared with another school? Or would we be competing for rehearsal space and our own auditorium? The Brooklyn Paper: Family Calendar

Monday, April 14, 2008

Atlantic Free Press - Hard Truths for Hard Times - Destroying Public Education in America

1 comments

Atlantic Free Press - Hard Truths for Hard Times - Destroying Public Education in America PLEASE click on this link and read it all the way through, even if you read nothing else on my blog. This article is AMAZING!

idealist.org - Welcome to Idealist.org - Imagine. Connect. Act.

0 comments

Just some commentary left on their idealist profile... to balance the story a bit. Click this link: idealist.org - Welcome to Idealist.org - Imagine. Connect. Act.

Brooklynian.com | Brooklyn Blog and Message Boards :: View topic - Proposed Charter School at PS 15 STOP IT NOW!!!!

0 comments

Click on the following link to see what other people are saying about the PAVE Academy:
Brooklynian.com Brooklyn Blog and Message Boards :: View topic - Proposed Charter School at PS 15 STOP IT NOW!!!!

Location | PAVE Academy Charter School

1 comments

Location PAVE Academy Charter School Please read this statement from their website carefully; note that they're in discussion with the DoE, not the community, about locations....

And keep in mind that they've been offered newly built, available space outside of PS15, but that they allowed too much time to pass before making a decision on the other location and lost it, and that Spencer Robinson complained about rental and other real estate prices and the cost of running a charter school during a small informational meeting at PS15. Boo, hoo: while charter schools get less funding than public schools from governmental sources, they're allowed (and expected) to do loads more fundraising to cover their expenses - the money's out there, especially for children's educational and cultural enrichment.

Gmail - Google Alert - PAVE Academy Charter School - emilyholiday@gmail.com

0 comments

http://mail.google.com/mail/?source=navclient#inbox/1194ba95e079749c Click on the link for more internet material on the PAVE Academy

Tuesday, April 8, 2008

WEDDINGS/CELEBRATIONS; Sarah Collins, Spencer Robertson - New York Times

0 comments

This is just a side note, but provides a little personal background on Spencer Robertson. He's apparently from a very well-off background... it must be nice to work for good old dad, but what about those hedge funds? How well is he really going to fit in in a place like Red Hook? Is he just "slumming", or does he have a real interest in improving education for local students, or is he just trying to compensate for having come up with plenty of advantages? WEDDINGS/CELEBRATIONS; Sarah Collins, Spencer Robertson - New York Times

Building Excellent Schools: Fellow-Founded Schools

0 comments

Click on the link for recent fellowship recipients.

Building Excellent Schools: Fellow-Founded Schools

Building Excellent Schools, fellowship programs

0 comments

Click on this link and you'll see the links to the fellowship programs offered by Building Excellent Schools. Spencer Robertson's getting $80,000 to start a charter school in their "home" communities.

Thing is, I just can't see Spencer Robertson calling Red Hook home, unless he's planning to move to Red Hook soon - into one of those buildings that's selling for a million dollars. We all know what gentrification does to neighhborhoods... especially to the people who were there for years BEFORE gentrification. (Anyone who isn't sure should read some Jane Jacobs...)
Building Excellent Schools: Fellowship

Building Excellent Schools: Bio Details

0 comments

Click on the following link to see a profile of Spencer Robinson; I think it's interesting that while he has some professional experience teaching, his B.A. from Duke doesn't mention any focus on education, and obviously his Stanford M.B.A. is NOT an education degree. It's also interesting to note that his charter school, the PAVE Academy, is a project he's working on is through a Fellowship program , presumably through Building Excellent Schools. Some of the work details listed here make it sound like he may be more interested in running businesses than being on the front lines teaching. Since his most advanced degree is an M.B.A., it annoys me even more that during the meeting we had at the school last month, he challenged my questions about the legitimacy of his running a private business (the non-profit charter academy) on public school property - he tried to duck my question by questioning whether his non-profit was actually a business. He KNOWS it is, and he assumes that he's dealing with ignorant or uninformed people.

So my question today is this: is his commitment truly to educating students, or to establishing and administering education programs? I'm asking because the teachers who work at PS15 have shown their true dedication to teaching by remaining committed to working with the Red Hook population over the course of years - more years than the meager three that Mr. Robertson spent teaching in Harlem.

Anyway, have a look at the profile.
Building Excellent Schools: Bio Details

Monday, April 7, 2008

Fwd: Charter Schools being placed in existing public schools

0 comments



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: DiLiberto Lisa (15K029) <LDiLiberto@schools.nyc.gov>
Date: Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 11:32 AM
Subject: RE: Charter Schools being placed in existing public schools
To: emilyholiday@gmail.com


Hi Emily,
I am not aware of the charter school you are referring to however this did occur at NEST+M 2 years ago when the chancellor wanted to place Courtney Ross's charter school in their building. Courtney Ross is the founder of The Ross Institute in East Hampton which is a private school. The parents and students at NEST, reserved 2 Jitney's and took a ride to EH in polite protest of the disruption this charter school would cause to their building and community. The parents won, but the charter wound up kicking out a school that was housed at TWEED.
The principal at NEST from that event no longer works at the school, but you may want to give the parent coordinator a call to see if that person would be willing to give you some ideas as to how they protested and won.

Good luck.


Best,
Lisa di Liberto
PS 29 Parent Coordinator
425 Henry Street
Brooklyn, NY 11201
347.563.5386
ldiliberto@schools.nyc.gov
www.ps29brooklyn.org <http://www.ps29brooklyn.org/>
<http://www.nycps29pc.blogspot.com/>


________________________________

From: Emily [mailto:emilyholiday@gmail.com]
Sent: Mon 3/31/2008 11:31 AM
To: shy1995@msn.com
Subject: Charter Schools being placed in existing public schools


I'm the mother of a student at PS15 in Red Hook, and as you may have heard, the Department of Education has decided to place a new charter school in our building starting next fall. Many of the parents connected with the school - and other members of the community - are quite upset by this. Our school has received high grades, and excels in serving its existing student population - and has small classes and a "family" feel that really supports the students in many positive ways. As part of the effort to protest this decision, I've set up a blog that provides substantial background on the issue, and I'd like to ask you to take a look at  your convenience, and if you have any suggestions or feedback on how we can successfuly block having a second school arbitrarily placed on our premises, we'd be glad to hear from you.

And just for the sake of democratic argument, if you have an interesting argument pro-charter schools, feel free to speak up on that as well.

Here's the link to the blog: http://charter-free-ps15.blogspot.com/

Thanks for your consideration -

Emily Brown



--
You can also reach me by phone at 917-720-7335.

Check out my digital photography at http://picasaweb.google.com/emilyholiday/EmilyBrown; I also have a short slideshow video at http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4527071836788208173

Re: Charter Schools

0 comments

Thanks for your response, and for looking into the matter. My understanding of what happened at that meeting was that the plan to place the PAVE Academy Charter School in PS15's building has been temporarily put on hold. While that may be a step in the right direction, and I definitely appreciate Councilmember Gonzales's efforts to support PS15 in this matter, this is still a  a temporary resolution, and the bottom line is that we're still concerned that the DOE will put off making a definite decision until so late in June that it will be difficult for us to coordinate an appropriate response should they decide to place the charter school in our building - and when I've called the DOE on several occasions, they have given me incredibly vague responses that amount to this : they dont know when they'll make the final decision about placement of the school, they don't know when they'll schedule an official meeting with the community about this, and nobody there seems to know (or won't tell me) who's responsible for scheduling these meeting or making the decisions (this is according to Michael Duffy himself, by the way).
 
Anyway, what can parents at PS15 do to make the DOE schedule an official meeting, get them to answer our questions honestly, and how can we best make it clear that we don't want the DOE to place a private business (which is what this charter school is) on the premises of a public school that deserves their full support - especially since PS15 has received honors in the past few years for fully supporting the educational needs of children in a neighborhood that has remarkably few other resources? The combination of both PS15 and the Beacon program that's housed in the school make the place an anchor for the community, and a valuable resource will have to struggle much harder in the face of budget cuts if an additional and  competing institution is co-housed in the same building - this would be completely wrong, and can't be allowed to happen.
 
Thanks
 
Emily Brown 

On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Sarah Figuereo <sarah.figuereo@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello Emily,
 
I am Sarah and I work for Councilmember Bill de Blasio. I spoke to Mark Schwienzberg at Councilmember Gonzales office and they said they held a meeting with the community, school, parents, and DOE.
 
I am trying to get more information on what the outcomes was of those meetings. I will inform you as I get the information. Thank you for alerting us.

--
Sarah Figuereo
Councilmember Bill de Blasio
2907 Ft. Hamilton Parkway
Brooklyn, NY 11218
(O) 718-854-9791
(F) 718-854-1146
(C) 347-277-9972
This message and any attachments is intended for the named addressee(s)
only and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential.
If you receive this message in error, please delete it and immediately
notify the Office of New York City Councilmember Bil de Blasio. Any copying,
dissemination or disclosure, either whole or partial, by a person who is
not the named addressee is prohibited.



--
You can also reach me by phone at 917-720-7335.

Check out my digital photography at http://picasaweb.google.com/emilyholiday/EmilyBrown; I also have a short slideshow video at http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4527071836788208173

Friday, April 4, 2008

Insideschools.org - Where to get help outside the school system

0 comments

Insideschools.org - Where to get help outside the school system Click on this link for lists of organizations that may be able to help should we continue to fight the charter school placement at our school

Charters Go to New Recruitment Lengths | The New York Sun

0 comments

Click on the following link to find out what depths charter schools sink to in order to boost enrollment. Pay special attention to the part where the article discusses how the DOE helps charters recruit by making mailing lists available through a mailing house. Where do you think the DOE really stands on supporting public schools vs. charter schools? Charters Go to New Recruitment Lengths The New York Sun

Battle Over School Space Will Heat Up Today | The New York Sun

0 comments

More coverage of another public school's current fight against a charter school co-location - click on the link below:
Battle Over School Space Will Heat Up Today The New York Sun

News Copy, New York: Charter Schools

0 comments

News Copy, New York: Charter Schools: "charter schools"
This is a blog with some odd analyses of the charter school situation, and it also has a batch of links to mainstream news outlet blogs that may be useful for additional research.

As Bid to Privatize Schools Ends, Supporters Second-Guess Effort - New York Times

0 comments

This is somewhat deep history on the opposition to privatization issue, but is relevant because there appears to be an ongoing pattern of the DOE giving less support to public schools in less affluent neighborhoods - and possibly neighborhoods where they feel there isn't going to be much organized resistance.

As Bid to Privatize Schools Ends, Supporters Second-Guess Effort - New York Times

Thursday, April 3, 2008

Public Advocate for the City of New York – How We Help

0 comments

Public Advocate for the City of New York – How We Help
Click on this link to find out more about how the Public Advocate (Betsy Gotbaum)'s office can help with education issues.

An Opposing Viewpoint

1 comments

Hi Emily: I do have had extensive experience with charter schools & space issues in NYC. Think about it. Schools are large, fixed spaces. Communities that serve these schools fluctuate in size. This means that over time some buildings become very overcrowded and other buildings become very underutilized. The DOE places multiple schools into underutilized buildings to minimize the overcrowding in other schools. . The DOE has moved past the idea one building, one school; it just doesn’t work anymore. I was at a school building recently that had 3 schools (a K-8 DOE school, a DOE 75 special ed school & a new charter school). The school building was still dramatically under-utilized. Its capacity was 1400 and it only had 800 students. The charter school was leaving, and the DOE was intending to place a large second elementary school in the newly freed up space. I just checked & your school building is one of the most under-utilized elementary school buildings in Brooklyn. . It has space for 762 students and as of 06-07 had only 409 students enrolled. You are at 53% capacity. (http://source.nycsca.org/pdf/bluebook/classic_report_final.pdf) If you can fight off this particular charter school, that doesn’t mean that the DOE won’t turn around and fill your school with something else, like overflow from another school or a 75 special ed school. By the way, the ones that suffer most from this arrangement are the charter school, not the existing school. The existing principal has the upper hand in deciding whether or not the new school gets to use the gym or the auditorium or the play space. So why don’t charter schools get their own facilities? Well, they are public schools, but they only get 70 cents on the dollar for educating each child. The missing 30 cents is the money that the district spends on facilities. So they have no choice but to go into DOE schools. Your school does have good reviews, but that doesn’t mean that it works for every parent in your neighborhood. There are parents on the charter school side who would like a choice besides PS 15. In my experience, a strong and positive school culture comes from parents, teachers and the leadership at the school. There is no correlation between a school being isolated in a building and its having a family and friendly feeling. Hope this helps answer your question, - Elena

a blurb from Class Size Matters (sorry it's after the fact)

0 comments

Leonie Haimson to nyceducationne


A total of 15 new charter schools are being established next year – a record for NYC.
 
 See message below from mom at PS 15 in Red Hook in D15 in Brooklyn – which is being forced to accept a charter school in its building against the wishes of parents and staff at the school.  She has posted a blog at : http://charter-free-ps15.blogspot.com/  that you should check out and post comments on.
 
There is also a meeting tomorrow night at P.S. 123 about a new charter school, Harlem Success Academy, one in Eva Moskowitz' chain of charter schools, that is being placed in their building against the will of the CEC in D5 and parents at the school.
 
TIME: 5:30 PM
SPEAKER'S LIST:  5:30- 6:15 PM
DAY:  Tuesday
DATE:  April 1, 2008
LOCATION:  301 W. 140th Street| Village of Harlem
 
 
Meanwhile, see article in NY Sun here about the recruiting efforts of these schools, that are apparently being given access to public school parents names and addresses through the DOE mail house. http://www.nysun.com/news/new-york/charters-go-new-recruitment-lengths
 
 
Leonie Haimson
Executive Director
Class Size Matters
124 Waverly Pl.
New York, NY 10011
212-674-7320
leonie@att.net
www.classsizematters.org
http://nycpublicschoolparents.blogspot.com/
 
Please make a tax-deductible contribution to Class Size Matters now!

feedback from another school

1 comments

Hello
This is my two cents:
My school, PS 295, shares space with MS 443. We were in this building first. Sharing works out just fine.

Shari Pulido
Parent Coordinator
PS 295
718-965-0390  x4105
347-563-5367  cell

Here's a real downer...

0 comments

I got this message recently, and it's depressing:

DOE has made several decisions with or without parental consent or
concerns, and they will continue to do so. Please keep in mind the NYC
School System is run by the Mayor??
The decisions are done deals.
CEC
District 181106 East 95th Street, Rm. 112Brooklyn, NY 11236Phone:
718-566-6037Fax: 718-649-7074cec18@schools.nyc.gov

Advice From The Trenches - URGENT! PLEASE READ THIS!

0 comments

I'd like to share something that another parent affiliated with another school emailed me yesterday. I think it's very important to pay attention to the experiences of others who have been in the trenches over this (and related) issues.

John White is an arrogant man with a corporate mentality who has no sense
of what it is to be a child or a parent in the public school system -- nor does
he have the intention or interest in learning. He makes changes that
affect 1000s of children based on superficial numbers that he has in a piece of
paper. Another thing that we've learned through this process is that no
one in the DOE is trustworthy. The way to battle them is to move quickly,
because the more time passes the more difficult it is for them to
retreat. We were able to mobilize more than 350 parents in 3 days, had an
emergency PTA meeting with the Superintendent where the voices of the parents
were unified. We planned a press conference for the following week and let
them know that we were going to have the press conference. After the press
release went out and they read it, they called an emergency meeting two days
before the scheduled press conference. The other issue that you need
to consider is that the new Charter school will affect your school even more now
with the anticipated average $100,000 cut per school through the State and City
budget cuts. The Charter School will represent additional cuts on top of
those Citywide losses. Is the Charter School planned for the same
grades/services currently provided by PS 15? We can't stress enough
the importance of becoming organized and unified as a school community.

Wednesday, April 2, 2008

The DOE is stalling...

0 comments

I may have mentioned that I spoke to Michael Duffy yesterday, asking when a meeting would be scheduled to present the charter school issue to the Red Hook community, and he couldn't tell me when it would be - he mentioned that a colleague of his was the one that would be making that decision. He took my email address and said they'd be in touch. (Please, someone get me an oxygen tank in case I pass out from holding my breath!)
 
Today, I got an interesting voice mail from a very reputable source who I can't name at the moment, telling me that often the DOE doesn't schedule these meetings until they've already made a decision  - and the meetings are to present what's essentially a fait accompli, and warning me that we shouldn't be lulled into a false sense of security just because the placement of the charter school has been temporarily put on hold. At the very moment I was listening to the message, my cell phone rang, and it was a fellow named Chris calling from the Office of Charter Schools. I asked him point blank when the DOE planned to schedule a meeting, because the DOE is in violation of education law if it insists on placing the charter school in our public school without holding the community meeting first. He told me he didn't know; I asked him if he could find out who was in charge of making that decision, and how I could arrange to be notified - and he claimed not to know who handles these decisions. I told him I found that incredibly difficult to believe; I also let him know that we needed to have the meeting scheduled before June, because the community was entitled to have their voices heard on this issue, have a dialogue, and be included in the decision making process - and asked again whether he could find out who was in charge of booking the meetings and when it would be, and get back to me. He continued to be vague and unhelpful, which made me wonder why he'd bothered to call me in the first place. He said that the principal would be getting notification as soon as the DOE had scheduled the meeting, and that it would probably be scheduled before June. It's obnoxious that he called to essentially tell me NOTHING... and at the end of the conversation, I let him know that I'd be calling on a regular basis to follow up on this because it's critically important.
 
By the way, I've heard from various sources that the DOE often assumes that it can place charter schools in public schools where there won't be much resistance because they assume (often wrongly) that the PTA is not very strong or well organized or involved in the school's development and day-to-day operations. Let's show them that they've made a mistake about Red Hook!

Gmail - CEC 15 March Updates

0 comments

Our situation is mentioned in this newsletter, and CEC 15 appears to be supportive of our side. http://mail.google.com/mail/?source=navclient#inbox/1190cb5db687dd68

Tuesday, April 1, 2008

Public School 123 space spat pits Eva Moskowitz against Harlem parents

0 comments

Public School 123 space spat pits Eva Moskowitz against Harlem parents

Click the link above for a VERY interesting read, and see if you see some parallels. We're hardly alone in the fight between public and charter schools. This is an unusual story, though, because the apparently well-connected (or very much deluded about the extent of her power) head of THIS charter school brags that she'll fight back by bringing "hundreds" of parents supporting her school to a public meeting... can we all say CATFIGHT? Meow, meow.

DOE Lack of Response on when a community meeting will be scheduled...

0 comments

I called Michael Duffy's office this afternoon to find out when the DOE was planning to schedule a meeting with the community and PS15 to discuss placing the PAVE Academy in PS15; he told me he didn't know, but would check with a colleague and email me an answer.

Hmmm.

I wonder whether having more people call in on a regular basis would prompt him to find out and let us know sooner. Here's the phone number: 212-374-5419; you'll reach an automated voice system - choose 5 for Mr. Duffy.

GrandCentral: The New Way to Use Your Phones

1 comments

Apparently the NY Post is also interested in being kept in the loop on this issue.

GrandCentral: The New Way to Use Your Phones

At Charter School, Higher Teacher Pay - New York Times

0 comments

Here's a very controversial charter school model....
At Charter School, Higher Teacher Pay - New York Times

Public vs. Charter Schools: A New Debate - New York Times

0 comments

This is a somewhat old article, but shows that other schools have been in the same position as PS1, and that some of the official players are still the same...
Public vs. Charter Schools: A New Debate - New York Times

NEST M - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

0 comments

For an interesting story on what can happen when a school protests a proposed school sharing arrangement, check THIS out... some of you may remember hearing about this in the news a while back, but it's an interesting read.
NEST M - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Strength in Numbers? Another strategy...

0 comments

Narger@aol.com Dear Emily, As a parent of two public school students, I am extremely sympathetic to your concerns. I just learned that IS 88, a middle school in Park Slope that just came off the "at risk list" two years ago is scheduled to have a Charter School placed in its building next year as well. It seems counter-ntuitive. The DOE should be looking for ways to improve its failing or non-erforming schools rather than saturating its successful schools and their facilities with additional students. I haven't had an opportunity to visit your blog, but I wanted to suggest, if you haven't consideredt already, that you work together with other schools that are expecting new Charter Schools next and that have received high grades and address this problem systemically, rather than trying to preserve the small school feel of only PS 15. The DOE knows there is strength in numbers and many successful schools will be seeing their student populations increase significantly next year. Have you considered contacting the Head of Parent Outreach? askmartine@schools.nyc.gov I hope this information is useful. Sincerely, Rachel Gertzog

Fwd: [Charter-Free PS15] New comment on Web Visitors.

0 comments

I'm re-posting this more prominently so it's more visible to all ... and I appreciate the comment.
 
Now, of course, the question is WHEN this hearing will be scheduled? I've been trying to get the DOE to pin down a date and time, but I keep getting snarky responses from them, and based on my own prior experience in dealing with the DOE, they take their time and do things at THEIR convenience (rather than anyone else's) - and I'd hate to see this meeting take place in JUNE when there's no time for follow up if we don't get the results we want and need.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Anonymous <noreply-comment@blogger.com>
Date: Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 5:02 PM
Subject: [Charter-Free PS15] New comment on Web Visitors.
To: emilyholiday@gmail.com


Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Web Visitors":

NYS Charter School law states that there must be a public hearing prior to siting a charter school in an existing public school: http://www.newyorkcharters.org/documents/NYSCharterSchoolsActof1998.doc#S2853



Posted by Anonymous to Charter-Free PS15 at March 31, 2008 5:02 PM



--
You can also reach me by phone at 917-720-7335.

Check out my digital photography at http://picasaweb.google.com/emilyholiday/EmilyBrown; I also have a short slideshow video at http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4527071836788208173

Fwd: [Charter-Free PS15] New comment on General Question for Readers.

0 comments



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: involved parent <noreply-comment@blogger.com>
Date: Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:55 PM
Subject: [Charter-Free PS15] New comment on General Question for Readers.
To: emilyholiday@gmail.com


involved parent has left a new comment on your post "General Question for Readers":

It may not be considered a "charter" school but we are in the same boat as you. We had one high school imposed on us and now they are leaving. DOE wants to place yet another high school on us and we are fighting them tooth and nail on it. To read our story click on my name above.



Posted by involved parent to Charter-Free PS15 at March 31, 2008 10:55 PM



--
You can also reach me by phone at 917-720-7335.

Check out my digital photography at http://picasaweb.google.com/emilyholiday/EmilyBrown; I also have a short slideshow video at http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4527071836788208173

Fwd: Charter Schools being placed in existing public schools

0 comments



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: CEC19 D19 <CEC19@schools.nyc.gov>
Date: Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 1:29 PM
Subject: RE: Charter Schools being placed in existing public schools
To: emilyholiday@gmail.com


I'm sorry to hear that but if there wasn't a forum about it you can protest the whole thing.

Community Education Council 19
557 Pennsylvania Avenue Rm. 315
Brooklyn, New York 11207
(718) 272-8033

________________________________

From: Emily [mailto:emilyholiday@gmail.com]
Sent: Mon 3/31/2008 11:31 AM
To: shy1995@msn.com
Subject: Charter Schools being placed in existing public schools


I'm the mother of a student at PS15 in Red Hook, and as you may have heard, the Department of Education has decided to place a new charter school in our building starting next fall. Many of the parents connected with the school - and other members of the community - are quite upset by this. Our school has received high grades, and excels in serving its existing student population - and has small classes and a "family" feel that really supports the students in many positive ways. As part of the effort to protest this decision, I've set up a blog that provides substantial background on the issue, and I'd like to ask you to take a look at  your convenience, and if you have any suggestions or feedback on how we can successfuly block having a second school arbitrarily placed on our premises, we'd be glad to hear from you.

And just for the sake of democratic argument, if you have an interesting argument pro-charter schools, feel free to speak up on that as well.

Here's the link to the blog: http://charter-free-ps15.blogspot.com/

Thanks for your consideration -

Emily Brown



--
You can also reach me by phone at 917-720-7335.

Check out my digital photography at http://picasaweb.google.com/emilyholiday/EmilyBrown; I also have a short slideshow video at http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4527071836788208173

Monday, March 31, 2008

General Question for Readers

3 comments

Has anyone reading this blog participated in - or heard about - public schools successfully fighting (as in, winning a fight) with the DOE about having a charter school placed in their local public school? Would you care to share your insights and experiences? I was dismayed to see that some school buildings house more than two schools.

Please post responses!

Web Visitors

1 comments

I'm glad we've got the web counter installed; on Friday, there were only 300 hits, and today there are over 360 hits. People have been busy - we're getting lots of visits. NOW I wish people would comment on what we've got posted. It would be great to hear what other people think of the issues and posts so far.

If this is your first visit to this blog...

0 comments

Please make sure to scroll all the way down and also visit the archives for February for full background on the whole issue. There are a lot of layers to the story, and both the DOE and Spencer Robertson's plans don't seem to be as completely transparent as they should be, and some people have commented that there may be questions about the legalities regarding how the DOE is proceeding with their plans (especially in NOT having a community meeting to present what the plan IS before it was decided on).